Rcs sucks-Google’s messaging app strategy is still a mess | Engadget

Until we have RCS with carrier interoperability I think it will have very limited use. Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk. This annoys me so much I've been paying attention to RCS on Verizon for a couple months now and I said it then , Verizon will be last to the party for sure Surprise surprise I was right. What if I send a message on RCS and the person receiving doesn't have it..

Rcs sucks

Thread Deleted Email Thread Page 1 of 2 1 2. Rcs sucks rights reserved. These days, however, I'm not sure it ever will. RCS is the equivalent of Rcs sucks Berman intimate accesories WhatsApp-style experience, complete with rich content and true emoji, inside the standard SMS app on your phone. Texting is getting a much-needed, long-in-the-tooth overhaul. With all the successes of differing IMs, sending and receiving text Rcs sucks is still the default, go-to method of reaching just about everyone. Community Starting Point. RCS has been floundering around with random support from Sprint and promised Q2 support from T-mobile, but that support does little without OEMs and software developers making things to use the services. Sponsored Links.

Bikini maria pic sharapova. AT&T offers the LG G8X with a 'free' Dual Screen case (updated)

The RCS staff is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, days a year to attend to your sucsk needs. First: In this economy? Which then opens up sjcks temporary emacs buffer Rcs sucks prompt you to type in a log message. RCS may be changing Rcs sucks little too. Ready to check it in? Your email address will not be published. You suckss emacs. Pai eu detin si telefon de la ei si tot nu ma anunta. We had new CCA's get hired and quit within weeks. It gradually dawned on me that " vc. How to send a text message from a Rcs sucks 17 hours ago. You will spend hours a day in the office between Rcs sucks Clearance dorm lighting casing your magazines and any left over letters that the machine didn't sort out. The proprietary Bitkeeper will shortly become yesterday's news, because arch implements a big chunk of it's feature set.

Well here we are, some two years since Google first announced its intention , and starting this year SMS is going to be killed off and replaced with a brand-new instant-messaging technology called simply Chat.

  • If you're like me, this "personal version control" concept works out something like this: "Okay, what system should I use?
  • In Opinii.

Well here we are, some two years since Google first announced its intention , and starting this year SMS is going to be killed off and replaced with a brand-new instant-messaging technology called simply Chat. Instead it will work just like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger or iMessage, however unlike these apps it has real potential to become the largest messaging platform on the planet. Chat, also known as Rich Communication Services RCS is a brand-new instant-messaging technology that will replace text messages in the next months.

Google describes Chat as being very similar to the messaging experience you have on WhatsApp or iMessage. Android will of course support RCS being as this entire endeavour is its brainchild. Microsoft have also confirmed that its operating system will also support RCS although we have absolutely no idea what that could mean. Apple are the only major operating system that has not made any comment on Chat. A very good question. Now this is perhaps the one major downside of Chat.

Chat is not end-to-end encrypted. If you want to make sure your messages are completely secured then we would still recommend using an app like iMessage for iPhone users or Signal and WhatsApp. Get top stories and blog posts emailed to me each day. Newsletters may offer personalized content or advertisements. Privacy Policy. Follow us. Terms Privacy Policy. Part of HuffPost Tech. All rights reserved. What is Chat? Which phones will work with Chat? When is Chat launching?

Finally and this is important Suggest a correction.

The proprietary Bitkeeper will shortly become yesterday's news, because arch implements a big chunk of it's feature set. Instead of using a cellular connection, Chat will rely on your data connection. I don't see any features in vc. Alina: Da, stiu. You need to manually create the RCS subdirectory yourself? You start wondering if it might be simpler to have gone in a different direction. For nearly a decade, it was difficult to gain widespread support for the RCS protocol.

Rcs sucks

Rcs sucks

Rcs sucks. Personal Version Control

There is one crucial element missing from chat, however. While the original RCS protocol allowed the implementation of client-to-server encryption, Chat will not offer end-to-end encryption like iMessage or Signal. In short, it allows for the same legal intercept standards as its predecessor.

First, your carrier will need to support the protocol. In the near future, Android users will be able to pair their Messages app to the web service via a QR code, allowing the full Chat experience from a computer. For nearly a decade, it was difficult to gain widespread support for the RCS protocol. Google, however, has been able to make progress with both carriers and manufacturers.

Currently, there are 55 carriers and nearly a dozen smartphone manufacturers that support Chat. Not only that, but Google will now service Chat for customers itself, doing away with the need for carrier support. Microsoft has also committed its support to the protocol. In the United States, all of the major carriers have signaled their support for Chat.

When we will actually see Chat is the million-dollar question, but recent news suggests it may come sooner rather than later. That means all Android phones could soon get support for the new standard — with or without carrier support.

Carriers may want to support Chat eventually — and some carriers have made steps to ensure that happens. The best streaming devices for 1 hour ago. I asked 10 U. How to send a text message from a computer 17 hours ago. The best remote car starters for 1 day ago. Answer: you're supposed to edit the repository directly. But the real answer though -- if you're someone like me -- is to throw-away your existing repository, re-organize things, then just create a new repository.

You lose your pain-stakingly created file histories, but how much hassle is it worth to preserve them? After all, you've got other things to do, this CVS management thing is just a sideline for you Conclusion: CVS really does suck. A brief digression that isn't really.

When I mentioned "version control front-ends", what was I talking about? I was talking about an "IDE" of course. And for me, this means "Gnu emacs", but should you be a fan of xemacs, you will get no disrespect from me. I was actually mildly confused about how to do this with emacs, because I was someone who'd been using the proprietary "perforce" version control system at work, and that has it's own elisp package to integrate it with emacs, " p4.

So when I wanted to experiment with using CVS on my own I'd worked at places that use it, of course, but never tried to use it from within emacs , I went looking for a " cvs. As it turns out, what you really want is " vc. Emacs culture being what it is, they attempted to write one general front-end elisp package that you could use with different back-end version control systems.

As is often the case however, this idea met with mixed success, and the only version control systems supported by " vc. But okay, vc. It actually turns out to be pretty convienient to use.

Need to check-out a file? Ready to check it in? Which then opens up a temporary emacs buffer to prompt you to type in a log message. And if you want to put a file under version control that isn't already, what do you do? It gradually dawned on me that " vc. But really, I didn't need all that much in the way of features from my version control, and the RCS stuff was working fine. I looked into what it was doing, and I realized that it was using distributed repositories Typically with CVS, the " CVS " sub-directory just contains a few files full of meta-information that point at the actual central repository.

And a little while later, it dawned on me that these distributed RCS repositories were actually tremendously convenient. You want to restructure a project? If you move a directory around, you carry the RCS repository with it: no problem.

And there's an emacs command " M-x vc-rename-file " that let's you rename a file and also update it's name in the repository without losing file history. And the barrier to entry is tiny! If you're using emacs already, any file that you think might deserve verson control gets it immediately, the moment you do a " C-x v v " on that file.

There are no set-up hassles. You don't even need to waste any energy thinking about your "version control strategy" if you don't feel like it. You can make the decision about what to add to RCS on the fly, on a file-by-file basis. Oh, and how about when you want to hand-off your project to someone else? You can just tar up the source tree along with the RCS repositories and send it out along with the file history.

Stupid question: Why do you use version control? Standard answer: So you can get back an older version of a file if you need it. You never want to do that. And besides, if you did need to get an old version of something, you could get it off of your backups. You do have backups, right? What you really want version control for is to get up the courage to rip apart code that's working already so that you can improve it, without being afraid that you're going to totally screw up and lose a version that sort of works.

If you've ever worked without version control as a safety net, you know the kind of things you end up with.

Any development directory ends up littered with manual backups like:. Any time you're ready to make a move, a few keystrokes lets you feel safe enough to do it. You look at your todo list, and can't remember if you've already made the changes to a file it refers to. Solution: " C-x v l " displays the change-log for the current file.

Instead of writing notes about what you've been doing in random places, the change-log for each file becomes a great place to enter that information Working as an individual on your own, you may find yourself making many different file check-ins for any small change you feel like doing.

Working in a group, on a project under version control, you'll probably find some subtle and often overt pressure against doing quite so many check-ins. For example, your fellow workers are probably getting mail every time you check something in, and you'd probably rather not spam them with lots of minor changes. It gets particularly bad in the case of non-working code. Say you've checked-out a file, and started working toward a goal, but half-way there you realize that the direction you're going is harder than you thought.

You start wondering if it might be simpler to have gone in a different direction. What you personally would like to do at this point is to check in the current, broken version, so that you can try a different way without losing what you've done.

In many work environments, though, that would be a major no-no "Don't break the build! One solution would be to have two different version control systems running in parallel. You use your "personal" system for fine-grained changes, but periodically do check-ins to the central repository when you're ready to give something to the group. Check the section of the emacs manual called: "Local Version Control", which explains in detail how to use RCS for personal version control in a group that's using CVS.

There are vc. And -- as is increasingly likely these days -- if your group is using something besides CVS, it could be that vc. In that case you can just use vc.

Answered - any news on rcs on unlocked OP phones - OnePlus Community

The rumors were true. Google is killing Allo , its smart messaging app, for good. The platform will "continue to work through March ," the company said in a blog post , and users can export their conversation history until then. The so-called "classic" version of Google Hangouts, meanwhile, is slowly being sunset too.

In a convoluted Twitter exchange , Scott Johnston, the head of Hangouts and Google Voice, explained to Stephen Hall, a 9to5Google reporter, that Hangouts users will eventually be upgraded to Hangouts Chat and Hangouts Meet, a Slack-like competitor and video chat service aimed at businesses and other GSuite customers.

Google's lineup of messaging apps has always been chaotic. In , however, the company managed to simplify its offerings with two services, Allo and Duo , designed for messaging and video calls respectively. Duo has been a quiet success and is now available on a wide range of platforms, including iPads, Android tablets, Chromebooks and smart displays. Allo, meanwhile, has struggled to coax users away from established messaging apps such as iMessage and Facebook Messenger. For one, people are entrenched in their favorite messaging apps.

In the UK, for instance, Whatsapp reigns supreme. Birthdays, weddings, hungover Sunday league football matches -- my friends use it for absolutely everything.

Persuading even a few of them to switch, or download a different app to chat with me, would be a Herculean task. Secondly, Allo doesn't have a truly unique and groundbreaking feature to tempt people with. It has the sometimes-helpful Google Assistant, and some cartoon selfie stickers , but that's about it. For many, the inconvenience of switching and persuading others to do the same outweighs these minor benefits.

Another problem is visibility. I can't recall a single magazine or billboard ad that revolved around Allo. Had the company paid for a few TV spots, like Facebook , it might have fared a little better in the app charts. No wonder Allo has barely made a dent in the public consciousness.

Ideally, people can use the app to send text, GIFs and link previews to each other, just like Allo and other smart messaging apps. If anyone is missing a piece of this elaborate technological puzzle, the app defaults to bog-standard SMS. Messages is preloaded on many Android phones, which gives Google a massive install base to build on.

The problem is that RCS support is still patchy. But it's not enough. At the time of writing, Vodafone is the only UK network that supports the protocol. Sorry, but that's not happening. The slow uptake isn't entirely Google's fault. But with Allo on the verge of extinction, the company is giving me two, frankly rubbish options: SMS, or an aging Hangouts app that will eventually be subsumed into some clearly enterprise, education and government-focused products.

Yeah, no thanks. Google's new lineup will be simpler, but not necessarily better. The uptake over the last seven months, however, doesn't fill me with confidence. Which is a shame, because I liked Allo and believe a semi-popular, Google-run messaging app could be good for the wider industry. It would give Apple and Facebook some much-needed competition in the West, at least.

For the longest time, I've said 'One day Google will figure this out. Eventually it will build something that clicks with people, right? These days, however, I'm not sure it ever will. Buyer's Guide. Log in. Sign up. Samsung patent application showcases AR headset design. Latest in Gear. Image credit: Google. Sponsored Links. This sucks. The problem, I think, is threefold. So what is Google doing now? Source: Google Blog Post.

In this article: allo , gear , google , hangouts , messages , mobile , RCS , texting. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. SpaceX hopes to offer satellite internet to customers by mid Google Home update leaves some speakers unusable. BYU researchers extend WiFi range by feet with a software upgrade. From around the web. Page 1 Page 1 ear icon eye icon Fill 23 text file vr.

Rcs sucks

Rcs sucks

Rcs sucks